Mediation Vs. Collaborative Divorce: Which Option Is Ideal for You?

By June 26, 2020Divorce
Mediation Vs. Collaborative Divorce: Which Option Is Ideal for You?

Both mediation and collaborative divorce are aimed at preventing court procedures. They help protect the divorcing couple from the consequences of litigation, such as legal costs, emotional anguish, and lack of privacy. They also provide higher chances for a mutually beneficial resolution to a divorce case. 

Many couples opt for either mediation or collaborative divorce over the traditional divorce process. Rather than face drawn-out court procedures, they prefer to find other amicable solutions to their separation. That said, there are some differences between mediation vs. collaborative divorce.

If you wish to forgo litigation and go with one of these, consult an experienced Tacoma Divorce Attorney to find out your options and how to pursue them. 

How Does Mediation Work?

The mediated divorce process involves a neutral party who is typically an attorney trained in mediation. He/she works up an agreement that works for both the wife and husband and protects the interest of any children produced by their union.

Once the divorcing couple reaches an agreement, the mediator drafts a document to reflect it. Each party then hires an attorney to review the document, propose any changes, and explain its legal ramifications. The attorneys then file the documents necessary for obtaining a Judgment of Divorce from the court.

Mediators do not represent either party. Instead, they act as a neutral guide who advises on any divorce-related legal, logistical, or financial issues.

How Does Collaborative Divorce Work?

In the collaborative divorce process, each party is represented by an attorney. Both attorneys work together towards obtaining a win-win result for their clients. They also work with a financial professional such as a planner or forensic accountant and a mental health expert.

The mental health professional handles the emotional aspects of divorce. He/she offers guidance on delicate matters such as custody and co-parenting. The financial expert, on the other hand, helps each party analyze new financial arrangements and formulate a budget.

Overall, collaborative divorce is considered a more efficient process as it addresses several aspects of divorce at once. It also involves a relatively larger team of professionals. 

Mediation Vs. Collaborative Divorce: Which One Should You Choose?

Both mediation and collaborative divorce have immense benefits. They allow you to resolve a separation peacefully and amicably. They also ensure that your kids’ rights are protected at all times. When choosing the best alternative for you, consider the following:

  • What is your financial condition? Generally, collaborative divorce is costlier than mediation.
  • Are you and your spouse on good terms? You should be able to work together towards a mutual goal.
  • How knowledgeable are you about family finances?

When deciding on mediation vs. collaborative divorce, consider your family dynamics. If you are stuck, you can talk to a Tacoma Divorce Attorney for professional advice.

Talk to a Tacoma Divorce Attorney

Divorce often involves many strong emotions. Some spouses may be bitter, and hell-bent on getting revenge. They could refuse to compromise and opt for more combative approaches. If you are having trouble dissolving your marriage peacefully, respectfully, and equitably, contact Alliance Law Group.

Our team is dedicated to helping our clients find better methods of finalizing a divorce. We will put our best Tacoma Divorce Attorney on your case and guide you through the entire separation process.

We look forward to working with you.  

 

Leave a Reply

You can still file for divorce in Washington. For years Alliance Law Group has implemented technology to work with our clients remotely. We have robust technology in place to allow us to work with clients over long-distances and maintain all of our client’s information on our secure servers. Continue...